| Title |
A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147868 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Vilizzi, Gordon H Copp, Jeffrey E Hill, Boris Adamovich, Luke Aislabie, Daniel Akin, Abbas J Al-Faisal, David Almeida, M N Amal Azmai, Rigers Bakiu, Adriana Bellati, Renée Bernier, Jason M Bies, Gökçen Bilge, Paulo Branco, Thuyet D Bui, João Canning-Clode, Henrique Anatole Cardoso Ramos, Gustavo A Castellanos-Galindo, Nuno Castro, Ratcha Chaichana, Paula Chainho, Joleen Chan, Almir M Cunico, Amelia Curd, Punyanuch Dangchana, Dimitriy Dashinov, Phil I Davison, Mariele P de Camargo, Jennifer A Dodd, Allison L Durland Donahou, Lennart Edsman, F Güler Ekmekçi, Jessica Elphinstone-Davis, Tibor Erős, Charlotte Evangelista, Gemma Fenwick, Árpád Ferincz, Teresa Ferreira, Eric Feunteun, Halit Filiz, Sandra C Forneck, Helen S Gajduchenko, João Gama Monteiro, Ignacio Gestoso, Daniela Giannetto, Allan S Gilles, Francesca Gizzi, Branko Glamuzina, Luka Glamuzina, Jesica Goldsmit, Stephan Gollasch, Philippe Goulletquer, Joanna Grabowska, Rogan Harmer, Phillip J Haubrock, Dekui He, Jeffrey W Hean, Gábor Herczeg, Kimberly L Howland, Ali İlhan, Elena Interesova, Katarína Jakubčinová, Anders Jelmert, Stein I Johnsen, Tomasz Kakareko, Kamalaporn Kanongdate, Nurçin Killi, Jeong-Eun Kim, Şerife Gülsün Kırankaya, Dominika Kňazovická, Oldřich Kopecký, Vasil Kostov, Nicholas Koutsikos, Sebastian Kozic, Tatia Kuljanishvili, Biju Kumar, Lohith Kumar, Yoshihisa Kurita, Irmak Kurtul, Lorenzo Lazzaro, Laura Lee, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Giovanni Leonardi, Rob S E W Leuven, Shan Li, Tatsiana Lipinskaya, Fei Liu, Lance Lloyd, Massimo Lorenzoni, Sergio Alberto Luna, Timothy J Lyons, Kit Magellan, Martin Malmstrøm, Agnese Marchini, Sean M Marr, Gérard Masson, Laurence Masson, Cynthia H McKenzie, Daniyar Memedemin, Roberto Mendoza, Dan Minchin, Laurence Miossec, Seyed Daryoush Moghaddas, Moleseng C Moshobane, Levan Mumladze, Rahmat Naddafi, Elnaz Najafi-Majd, Aurel Năstase, Ion Năvodaru, J Wesley Neal, Sarah Nienhuis, Matura Nimtim, Emma T Nolan, Anna Occhipinti-Ambrogi, Henn Ojaveer, Sergej Olenin, Karin Olsson, Norio Onikura, Kathryn O'Shaughnessy, Daniele Paganelli, Paola Parretti, Jiří Patoka, Richard Thomas B Pavia, Daniele Pellitteri-Rosa, Michèle Pelletier-Rousseau, Elfritzson M Peralta, Costas Perdikaris, Dariusz Pietraszewski, Marina Piria, Sophie Pitois, Laura Pompei, Nicolas Poulet, Cristina Preda, Riikka Puntila-Dodd, Ali T Qashqaei, Tena Radočaj, Hossein Rahmani, Smrithy Raj, David Reeves, Milica Ristovska, Viktor Rizevsky, D Ross Robertson, Peter Robertson, Laura Ruykys, Abdulwakil O Saba, José M Santos, Hasan M Sarı, Pedro Segurado, Vitaliy Semenchenko, Wansuk Senanan, Nathalie Simard, Predrag Simonović, Michał E Skóra, Kristína Slovák Švolíková, Evangelia Smeti, Tereza Šmídová, Ivan Špelić, Greta Srėbalienė, Gianluca Stasolla, Paul Stebbing, Barbora Števove, Vettath R Suresh, Bettina Szajbert, Kieu Anh T Ta, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Jonathan Tempesti, Thomas W Therriault, Hannah J Tidbury, Nildeniz Top-Karakuş, Elena Tricarico, Débora F A Troca, Konstantinos Tsiamis, Quenton M Tuckett, Pero Tutman, Umut Uyan, Eliza Uzunova, Leonidas Vardakas, Gaute Velle, Hugo Verreycken, Lizaveta Vintsek, Hui Wei, András Weiperth, Olaf L F Weyl, Emily R Winter, Radosław Włodarczyk, Louisa E Wood, Ruibin Yang, Sercan Yapıcı, Shayne S B Yeo, Baran Yoğurtçuoğlu, Anna L E Yunnie, Yunjie Zhu, Grzegorz Zięba, Kristína Žitňanová, Stacey Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| Portugal | 3 | 11% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,189,738
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,615
of 30,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,177
of 459,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#63
of 941 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 941 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.