| Title |
Fungal microbiomes are determined by host phylogeny and exhibit widespread associations with the bacterial microbiome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2021.0552 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier A. Harrison, Allan D. McDevitt, Jenny C. Dunn, Sarah M. Griffiths, Chiara Benvenuto, Richard Birtles, Jean P. Boubli, Kevin Bown, Calum Bridson, Darren R. Brooks, Samuel S. Browett, Ruth F. Carden, Julian Chantrey, Friederike Clever, Ilaria Coscia, Katie L. Edwards, Natalie Ferry, Ian Goodhead, Andrew Highlands, Jane Hopper, Joseph Jackson, Robert Jehle, Mariane da Cruz Kaizer, Tony King, Jessica M. D. Lea, Jessica L. Lenka, Alexandra McCubbin, Jack McKenzie, Bárbara Lins Caldas de Moraes, Denise B. O'Meara, Poppy Pescod, Richard F. Preziosi, Jennifer K. Rowntree, Susanne Shultz, Matthew J. Silk, Jennifer E. Stockdale, William O. C. Symondson, Mariana Villalba de la Pena, Susan L. Walker, Michael D. Wood, Rachael E. Antwis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 23% |
| Ireland | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 55% |
| Scientists | 22 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,310,776
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,947
of 11,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,023
of 438,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#61
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.