| Title |
Natural experiments and long-term monitoring are critical to understand and predict marine host–microbe ecology and evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthieu Leray, Laetitia G. E. Wilkins, Amy Apprill, Holly M. Bik, Friederike Clever, Sean R. Connolly, Marina E. De León, J. Emmett Duffy, Leïla Ezzat, Sarah Gignoux-Wolfsohn, Edward Allen Herre, Jonathan Z. Kaye, David I. Kline, Jordan G. Kueneman, Melissa K. McCormick, W. Owen McMillan, Aaron O’Dea, Tiago J. Pereira, Jillian M. Petersen, Daniel F. Petticord, Mark E. Torchin, Rebecca Vega Thurber, Elin Videvall, William T. Wcislo, Benedict Yuen, Jonathan A. Eisen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 26% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Panama | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 48 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 33 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 28% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#671,495
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,261
of 9,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,414
of 438,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#24
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.