@EniorJimenez Información falsa del 2020, desmentida en 2021 (por falta de base en «hechos científicos»). Los habitantes precolombinos de La Española, PR, etc. Eran de origen Arawak, no Carib. Estos tampocos migraron a la parte norte del Caribe. https://
@holland_tom @TheRestHistory To round out the materials: https://t.co/Qo7c2LtwEu Rejoinder here - https://t.co/evn2JwzZXI
Open Access UCL Research: Craniofacial morphology does not support a pre-contact Carib “invasion” of the northern Caribbean https://t.co/YAfiJxqmp2
@uoregon archaeologist @smfitzpatrick72 and others rebut pernicious attempt to revive Columbus' nonsense about Carib cannibalism. https://t.co/EBMzMLGFDB
Original publication: Chr. M. Giovas et al., Craniofacial morphology does not support a pre-contact Carib "invasion" of the northern Caribbean, @SciReports 11, 2021. 🔓 https://t.co/4euuEEWMUP
Craniofacial morphology does not support a pre-contact Carib “invasion” of the northern Caribbean https://t.co/3v5W25d0Pq
Craniofacial morphology does not support a pre-contact Carib “invasion” of the northern Caribbean https://t.co/B79aY4GXPm A reply to Ross et al. (2020) in Scientific Reports.
I thought phrenology went out when the 20th c started
What a surprise, another “craniometric” analysis found to be based on poor archaeology, rely uncritically on racist colonial accounts, contradict genetic evidence. Why is this still a thing?