↓ Skip to main content

Wrinkle ridges on Mercury and the Moon within and outside of mascons

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Wrinkle ridges on Mercury and the Moon within and outside of mascons
Published in
ICARUS, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.04.013
Authors

Lisa S. Schleicher, Thomas R. Watters, Aaron J. Martin, Maria E. Banks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 80%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 80%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,908,927
of 13,288,667 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
#1,359
of 3,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,573
of 251,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,288,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.