| Title |
Marking mosquitoes in their natural larval sites using 2H‐enriched water: A promising approach for tracking over extended temporal and spatial scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roy Faiman, Adama Dao, Alpha Seydou Yaro, Moussa Diallo, Samake Djibril, Zana Lamissa Sanogo, Yossi Ousmane, Margery Sullivan, Laura Veru, Benjamin J. Krajacich, Asha Krishna, Joy Matthews, Christine A.M. France, Gabriel Hamer, Keith A. Hobson, Tovi Lehmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,182,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#480
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,417
of 361,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.