↓ Skip to main content

Paleoproteomics of Mesozoic Dinosaurs and Other Mesozoic Fossils

Overview of attention for article published in PROTEOMICS, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Paleoproteomics of Mesozoic Dinosaurs and Other Mesozoic Fossils
Published in
PROTEOMICS, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/pmic.201800251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Higby Schweitzer, Elena R. Schroeter, Timothy P. Cleland, Wenxia Zheng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#959,964
of 13,347,801 outputs
Outputs from PROTEOMICS
#53
of 3,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,155
of 242,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROTEOMICS
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,347,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.