| Title |
The role of dried fish: A taphonomical model of fish butchering and long-term preservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.029 |
| Authors |
Irit Zohar, Richard Cooke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,869,042
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#313
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,877
of 359,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.