↓ Skip to main content

Infection at an ecotone: cross‐system foraging increases satellite parasites but decreases core parasites in raccoons

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Infection at an ecotone: cross‐system foraging increases satellite parasites but decreases core parasites in raccoons
Published in
Ecology, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/ecy.2808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara B. Weinstein, Jacey C. Van Wert, Mike Kinsella, Vasyl V. Tkach, Kevin D. Lafferty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,609,175
of 13,327,609 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#4,407
of 4,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,880
of 203,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,327,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.