↓ Skip to main content

First cycad seedling foliage from the fossil record and inferences for the Cenozoic evolution of cycads

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
Title
First cycad seedling foliage from the fossil record and inferences for the Cenozoic evolution of cycads
Published in
Biology Letters, July 2019
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boglárka Erdei, Mario Coiro, Ian Miller, Kirk R. Johnson, M. Patrick Griffith, Vickie Murphy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2019.
All research outputs
#575,352
of 13,384,384 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#736
of 2,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,997
of 220,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#25
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,384,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.