↓ Skip to main content

Drivers of productivity and its temporal stability in a tropical tree diversity experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Drivers of productivity and its temporal stability in a tropical tree diversity experiment
Published in
Global Change Biology, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/gcb.14792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Schnabel, Julia A. Schwarz, Adrian Dănescu, Andreas Fichtner, Charles A. Nock, Jürgen Bauhus, Catherine Potvin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#90,082
of 13,617,861 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#57
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,590
of 220,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#3
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.