| Title |
Natural climate solutions for Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abd6034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Ronnie Drever, Susan C. Cook-Patton, Fardausi Akhter, Pascal H. Badiou, Gail L. Chmura, Scott J. Davidson, Raymond L. Desjardins, Andrew Dyk, Joseph E. Fargione, Max Fellows, Ben Filewod, Margot Hessing-Lewis, Susantha Jayasundara, William S. Keeton, Timm Kroeger, Tyler J. Lark, Edward Le, Sara M. Leavitt, Marie-Eve LeClerc, Tony C. Lemprière, Juha Metsaranta, Brian McConkey, Eric Neilson, Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent, Danijela Puric-Mladenovic, Sebastien Rodrigue, Raju Y. Soolanayakanahally, Seth A. Spawn, Maria Strack, Carolyn Smyth, Naresh Thevathasan, Mihai Voicu, Christopher A. Williams, Peter B. Woodbury, Devon E. Worth, Zhen Xu, Samantha Yeo, Werner A. Kurz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 46 | 41% |
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 75% |
| Scientists | 22 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 74 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 73 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 87 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 279. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#131,287
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,211
of 12,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,895
of 463,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#42
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.