| Title |
Joint effects of climate, tree size, and year on annual tree growth derived from tree‐ring records of ten globally distributed forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira, Valentine Herrmann, Christine R. Rollinson, Bianca Gonzalez, Erika B. Gonzalez‐Akre, Neil Pederson, M. Ross Alexander, Craig D. Allen, Raquel Alfaro‐Sánchez, Tala Awada, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Patrick J. Baker, Joseph D. Birch, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Paolo Cherubini, Stuart J. Davies, Cameron Dow, Ryan Helcoski, Jakub Kašpar, James A. Lutz, Ellis Q. Margolis, Justin T. Maxwell, Sean M. McMahon, Camille Piponiot, Sabrina E. Russo, Pavel Šamonil, Anastasia E. Sniderhan, Alan J. Tepley, Ivana Vašíčková, Mart Vlam, Pieter A. Zuidema |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Brazil | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Panama | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 52% |
| Scientists | 27 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#931,397
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,130
of 6,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,882
of 443,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#32
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.