| Title |
StomataCounter: a neural network for automatic stomata identification and counting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.15892 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karl C. Fetter, Sven Eberhardt, Rich S. Barclay, Scott Wing, Stephen R. Keller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,168,495
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#2,994
of 8,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,623
of 349,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#94
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.