↓ Skip to main content

StomataCounter: a neural network for automatic stomata identification and counting

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
StomataCounter: a neural network for automatic stomata identification and counting
Published in
New Phytologist, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/nph.15892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl C. Fetter, Sven Eberhardt, Rich S. Barclay, Scott Wing, Stephen R. Keller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 47%
Unspecified 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,546,952
of 13,366,323 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#1,478
of 5,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,365
of 243,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#69
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,366,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.