↓ Skip to main content

A DNA barcode reference library of French Polynesian shore fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
Title
A DNA barcode reference library of French Polynesian shore fishes
Published in
Scientific Data, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41597-019-0123-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erwan Delrieu-Trottin, Jeffrey T. Williams, Diane Pitassy, Amy Driskell, Nicolas Hubert, Jérémie Viviani, Thomas H. Cribb, Benoit Espiau, René Galzin, Michel Kulbicki, Thierry Lison de Loma, Christopher Meyer, Johann Mourier, Gérard Mou-Tham, Valeriano Parravicini, Patrick Plantard, Pierre Sasal, Gilles Siu, Nathalie Tolou, Michel Veuille, Lee Weigt, Serge Planes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,543,129
of 13,371,296 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#367
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,009
of 222,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,371,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them