↓ Skip to main content

Resource acquisition strategies facilitate Gilbertiodendron dewevrei monodominance in African lowland forests

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ecology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Resource acquisition strategies facilitate Gilbertiodendron dewevrei monodominance in African lowland forests
Published in
Journal of Ecology, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.13278
Authors

Jefferson S. Hall, David J. Harris, Kristin Saltonstall, Vincent de Paul Medjibe, Mark S. Ashton, Benjamin L. Turner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,136,036
of 13,600,099 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#782
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,056
of 198,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.