| Title |
Dire wolves were the last of an ancient New World canid lineage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-03082-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela R. Perri, Kieren J. Mitchell, Alice Mouton, Sandra Álvarez-Carretero, Ardern Hulme-Beaman, James Haile, Alexandra Jamieson, Julie Meachen, Audrey T. Lin, Blaine W. Schubert, Carly Ameen, Ekaterina E. Antipina, Pere Bover, Selina Brace, Alberto Carmagnini, Christian Carøe, Jose A. Samaniego Castruita, James C. Chatters, Keith Dobney, Mario dos Reis, Allowen Evin, Philippe Gaubert, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, Graham Gower, Holly Heiniger, Kristofer M. Helgen, Josh Kapp, Pavel A. Kosintsev, Anna Linderholm, Andrew T. Ozga, Samantha Presslee, Alexander T. Salis, Nedda F. Saremi, Colin Shew, Katherine Skerry, Dmitry E. Taranenko, Mary Thompson, Mikhail V. Sablin, Yaroslav V. Kuzmin, Matthew J. Collins, Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Anne C. Stone, Beth Shapiro, Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Robert K. Wayne, Greger Larson, Alan Cooper, Laurent A. F. Frantz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 433 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 86 | 20% |
| Spain | 28 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 6% |
| Australia | 21 | 5% |
| Japan | 16 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 173 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 278 | 64% |
| Scientists | 141 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 72 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1024. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,001
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,610
of 99,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#639
of 534,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#48
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.